Artemocion Quality Assurance
1. Policy for Internal Quality Assurance
Mission Statement
Artemocion Dance & Leisure Studio is the Home of all Arts.
It offers a variety of lessons for everyone’s choice under one roof. All teachers and instructors are certified and qualified in their respective fields to ensure the highest quality education for students.
The mission statement is publicly available on the Studio’s website: https://artemocion.com/
Commitment to Quality and Inclusion
All students receive high-quality lessons, regardless of age, race, beliefs, or gender.
The Studio provides a safe and supportive environment for learning.
Discrimination and bullying are strictly prohibited. Complaints should be reported to the Head of the School, either orally or in writing, and will be addressed according to internal policies.
Internationally Recognized Qualifications
Artemocion offers courses leading to the following internationally recognized qualifications:
Royal Academy of Dance (RAD)
Exams: RAD Exams
Teacher Training: RAD Teacher Training
London Academy of Music & Dramatic Arts (LAMDA)
Policies & Procedures: LAMDA Policies
Examinations are conducted at the Studio by visiting foreign examiners.
2. Institutional Probity
Financial viability of courses is assessed before launch, considering both short-term (up to 1 year) and long-term (over 1 year) prospects.
3. Design and Approval of Programmes
Evaluation Process
Internal Evaluation:
Teacher recommendations
Student or guardian interest
External Evaluation:
Client inquiries about course availability
Market research and marketing tools
Course Planning
Exam-Oriented Courses: Aligned with RAD/LAMDA syllabi.
Non-Exam Courses: Objectives and structure include:
Course objectives
Topics covered
Teaching methods
Teacher responsible
Feedback collection
All courses undergo financial and strategic viability assessment before launch.
4. Student-Centred Learning, Teaching, and Assessment
Lessons and exams are tailored to students’ age and abilities.
Studio is accessible, including ramps and support for wheelchair-bound students.
Learning Support Assistants may participate in lessons if requested by legal guardians.
Exam process:
Exam format and success criteria explained by teachers
Students receive written feedback within 4–6 weeks
Missed exams are rescheduled according to board policy
Complaints or appeals handled via consultation with teachers, the Head of the Studio, and the relevant board
5. Student Admission, Progression, Recognition, and Certification
Open to all applicants.
Placement in exam-based courses is determined by:
Compliance with board requirements
Previous grades obtained at other studios
Teacher discretion based on attendance, participation, and ability
Certification is issued by the relevant board and forwarded to students at the next lesson or an agreed date.
6. Teaching Staff
Teachers hold relevant RAD/LAMDA qualifications.
Police conduct checks are mandatory upon engagement.
Continuous Professional Development (CPD) certificates are reviewed annually.
7. Learning Resources and Student Support
Teachers provide lesson planning and learning resources.
Support includes:
Mock exams and rehearsals
Individual online support
Studio equipment (PA system, projector, etc.) is maintained by the Studio.
8. Information Management
Data collected on:
Admissions
Attendance
Exam participation and results
Feedback from students and guardians
GDPR compliant; data retained for 40 years, anonymized after 4 years.
Data used for:
Compliance with laws
Internal quality assurance
Identifying trends and opportunities
Surveys, questionnaires, and Open Days gather feedback from students and guardians.
9. Public Information
Class schedules, exam dates, and events are published on the website, including:
Selection criteria
Learning outcomes
Qualifications and their equivalence (EQF/MQF, ECTS/ECVET)
Teaching, learning, and assessment procedures
Pass rates
Further learning opportunities
External links provide additional information from relevant boards.
10. Ongoing Monitoring and Periodic Review
Teachers regularly meet with the Head of the Studio to review student progress and program relevance.
Internal reviews include a panel of:
Head of Studio
Student representative
Teacher of a different discipline
Independent observer
Recommendations are implemented, and compliance is checked periodically.
Feedback may be forwarded to external boards when appropriate.



